DEVIATIONS from Expected "Projectile Motion" From: Robert McElwaine Date: 1995/09/29 MessageID: Pine.3.89.9509290327.X9543-0100000@sawdust.cvfn.org newsgroups: sci.engr.mech DEVIATIONS from Expected "Projectile Motion" One of the first "scientific" DOGMAS fed to new physics students is the doctrine about "projectile motion". Students are given several formulas or equations from which they can precisely calculate how high and far a projectile will travel given its initial speed and angle from the ground. But the results are NOT so absolute as students are led to believe, even if they take into account air resistance and Coriolis effects. Recent experiments have shown that if the projectile is SPINNING at HIGH SPEED, (at least 27,000 RPM), [axis of spin coinciding with line of projection], the projectile will travel HIGHER and FARTHER than expected! These experiments were conducted by physicists such as Dr. Bruce DePalma, formerly of M.I.T., and reported by Richard C. Hoagland in his 2-27-92 presentation to the United Nations about the "Monuments of Mars", their terrestrial connection, and their MATHEMATICAL MESSAGE about HYPER- DIMENSIONAL ENERGY SOURCES. [VHS Video copies of Hoagland's 93-minute presentation are available from: The MARS MISSION, 122 Dodd St., Weehawken, NJ 07087; 1-800-424-0031, Operator #5). Ask for "Hoagland's Mars: The U.N. Briefings--The Terrestrial Connection".] Similarly, experiments with falling gyroscopes have shown that a gyroscope whose enclosed rotor is spinning at high speed (about 27,000 RPM) falls AT A DIFFERENT RATE than when the same gyroscope falls with rotor NOT spinning. The AMOUNT of DEVIATION might depend on the MATERIAL COMPOSITION of the projectile or rotor, as suggested in the text of U.S. Patent #3,626,605, "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Secondary Gravitational Force Field", by Henry W. Wallace, Dec. 14, 1971, (see below). These DEVIATIONS are EASILY REPRODUCABLE, and effectively DIS-PROVE the OVER-HYPED "General Theory of Relativity" which states that gravity results from a "warping or distorion of space" caused by the MERE PRESENCE of mass. UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, especially to COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARDS. Robert E. McElwaine B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC P.S.: The ZERO/REDUCED-Gravity Chamber described below has obvious potential applications for Chemistry, Biology, Biophysics, Biochemistry, Medical Research, etc., allowing experiments which now can be done ONLY on the Space Shuttle, AT GREAT EXPENSE! Gravity-NEUTRALIZING Air/Spacecraft or ZERO/REDUCED-Gravity Chamber NASA should build an experimental spacecraft based on U.S. Patent #3,626,605, titled "METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING A SECONDARY GRAVITATIONAL FORCE FIELD", awarded to Inventor Henry W. Wallace on Dec. 14, 1971. [$3.00 per complete copy from U.S. Patent Office, 2021 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202; correct 7-digit patent number required. Or try getting it via your local public or university library's inter-library loan dept..] In the patent, Figs. 7A and 7B are basically side views of a gravity-NEUTRALIZING FLYING SAUCER, or, if anchored to the ground, a ZERO-GRAVITY CHAMBER [which could have MANY possible GROUND-level applications for science, medicine, manufacturing, etc.]. Each oval diagram shows a motor spinning a central disc at a very high speed, about 28,000 RPM, and also rotating two other discs sandwiched around the first disc, via gears, at a much slower speed, perhaps 2,800 RPM, in the opposite direction. The two outer discs have extensions [counter-balanced via off-center axis] that, as they rotate, alternately make contact with two wide extensions from opposite walls of the spacecraft. The central disc should have shallow spiral-shaped grooves on both sides for air-bearings, to allow the needed very close contact with the two outer discs. I should clarify that each of the two outer discs has ONLY ONE [counter-balanced] extension, each one pointed opposite (180 degrees) the extension of the other disc. VERY CLOSE CONTACT must be made as the disc extensions slide past the wall extensions in order to conduct the "Kinemassic" Energy (term coined by the Inventor) from the discs to the walls in an ALTERNATING CIRCULATION. The most important factor making it work is that the discs, extensions, and outer walls of the spacecraft MUST be made of any material(s) in which a very large majority of the atoms are of isotopes having "HALF-INTEGRAL ATOMIC SPINS", such as copper (3/2). All other parts, etc., should have a minority of such atoms. [See the appropriate column of the table of isotopes in the latest edition of "The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics."] Experimenters should use one motor to spin the center disc [Start small, such as only one or two feet in diameter.], and a 2ND SEPARATE motor to rotate the two outer discs, so their relative speeds can be varied to establish the needed conditions for PROPULSION of the spacecraft via "NEGATIVE WEIGHT" (with the spacecraft's "Kinemassic" field seemingly PUSHING AGAINST the earth's gravitational field, etc.). If we have to put up a space station, establish Moon bases, go to Mars, rendezvous with comets, etc., WHY DO IT THE HARD WAY?! Your favorite university or research company could make a BIG NAME for itself by making a small model of this work. For more information, answers to your questions, etc., please consult my CITED SOURCES. UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, especially to COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARDS. Robert E. McElwaine B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC